When I first heard about Daisy Christodoulou’s myth-busting book in which she adopts an evidence-based approach to education theory, I assumed that she and I would see things pretty much the same way. It was only when I read reviews (including Daisy’s own summary) that I realised we’d come to rather different conclusions from what looked like the same starting point in cognitive psychology. I’ve been asked several times why, if I have reservations about the current educational orthodoxy, think knowledge is important, don’t have a problem with teachers explaining things and support the use of systematic synthetic phonics, I’m critical of those calling for educational reform, rather than those responsible for a system that needs reforming. The reason involves the deep structure of the models, rather than their surface features.
concepts from cognitive psychology
Central to Daisy’s argument is the concept of the limited capacity of working memory…
View original post 2,086 more words